Executives reporting no AI impact on their own firm
1What this measures
Share of executives in a four-country survey (US, UK, Germany, Australia; more than 5,000 respondents) reporting no measurable AI impact on their firm's employment or productivity over the last three years, from Yotzov, Barrero and co-authors (NBER WP 34836).
Why it matters. Adoption headlines are broad, but firm-level impact is what adaptation means. Nine in ten firms seeing nothing yet is the productivity J-curve in survey form.
- Proxy types
- deployment, welfare
- Unit
- share
- Cadence
- annual
- Valve
- adoption to adaptation
2How we track this
- series
nber.executives_4_countries.no_ai_impact_share.pt - series
peoplematters.executives_4_countries.no_ai_employment_impact_share.pt - source NBER working papers and chapters · default tier 6 · NBER; abstract quotation
- source People Matters · default tier 5 · People Matters; short quotation
- Normal band
- ≥ 70.0%
- Fast band
- ≤ 40.0%
- Falsifying
- —
Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.
Applied to nber.executives_4_countries.no_ai_impact_share.pt.
3Tracker interpretation
The survey says what the productivity statistics say. Impact is expected, reported and rarely measured.
4Evidence
5Status and reasoning
Evaluator: 0.9 (NBER working papers and chapters, 2026-02-28) is inside the consistent band (lo=0.7 ). Auto-reason; band rationale: Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.
6Timeline notes
- 2026-02-28 executives_4_countries · 90.0%as of 2026-02-28
7Counterevidence
What cuts against this reading
Executives may not see impacts that exist below the firm-level line; the question asks about the last three years, which mostly predate agentic tools.
8Update history
- 2026-09-10unmeasured to consistent with normalconf — → 70 · evaluate
Evaluator: 0.9 (NBER working papers and chapters, 2026-02-28) is inside the consistent band (lo=0.7 ). Auto-reason; band rationale: Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.
9Confidence
70 / 95 — good evidence, some ambiguity
Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.
10Related
- Customer-support productivity uplift from a generative-AI assistant consistent with normal
- US labour productivity, year on year consistent with normal
- Enterprise pilots with measurable P&L impact consistent with normal