Skip to content
Slow Variables

Ask the data

Answers come from the same store as the site; every number is checked against the record it cites.

Adaptation · Adopters

Executives reporting no AI impact on their own firm

consistent with normal70/95 confidence, good evidence, some ambiguitygrade Clagging

1What this measures

Share of executives in a four-country survey (US, UK, Germany, Australia; more than 5,000 respondents) reporting no measurable AI impact on their firm's employment or productivity over the last three years, from Yotzov, Barrero and co-authors (NBER WP 34836).

Why it matters. Adoption headlines are broad, but firm-level impact is what adaptation means. Nine in ten firms seeing nothing yet is the productivity J-curve in survey form.

Proxy types
deployment, welfare
Unit
share
Cadence
annual
Valve
adoption to adaptation

2How we track this

  • series nber.executives_4_countries.no_ai_impact_share.pt
  • series peoplematters.executives_4_countries.no_ai_employment_impact_share.pt
  • source NBER working papers and chapters · default tier 6 · NBER; abstract quotation
  • source People Matters · default tier 5 · People Matters; short quotation
Normal band
≥ 70.0%
Fast band
≤ 40.0%
Falsifying

Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.

Applied to nber.executives_4_countries.no_ai_impact_share.pt.

3Tracker interpretation

The survey says what the productivity statistics say. Impact is expected, reported and rarely measured.

4Evidence

Latest point
90.0%as of 2026-02-28
executives_4_countries
Value the bands apply to
90.0%as of 2026-02-28

2 observations. Hollow points are disputed (see counterevidence). Every point links to its observation.

5Status and reasoning

consistent with normalsince 2026-09-10 · evaluate

Evaluator: 0.9 (NBER working papers and chapters, 2026-02-28) is inside the consistent band (lo=0.7 ). Auto-reason; band rationale: Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.

6Timeline notes

  • 2026-02-28 executives_4_countries · 90.0%as of 2026-02-28

7Counterevidence

What cuts against this reading

Executives may not see impacts that exist below the firm-level line; the question asks about the last three years, which mostly predate agentic tools.

8Update history

  1. 2026-09-10unmeasured to consistent with normalconf 70 · evaluate

    Evaluator: 0.9 (NBER working papers and chapters, 2026-02-28) is inside the consistent band (lo=0.7 ). Auto-reason; band rationale: Normal = at least 70% of firms report no measurable impact three years in, as with PCs at the same age; fast = a majority reporting impact (no-impact share under 40%). Between is `emerging`.

9Confidence

70 / 95 — good evidence, some ambiguity

Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.

10Related