Skip to content
Slow Variables

Ask the data

Answers come from the same store as the site; every number is checked against the record it cites.

Methods · Compute & physical

Training power draw growth (doubling time)

emerging50/95 confidence, mixed or hard to operationalisegrade Bleading

1What this measures

Doubling time of notable models' estimated training power draw, fitted log-linearly from 2020 on Epoch's notable-model table. Derived metric training_power_doubling_days.

Why it matters. Power is the physical constraint that compute growth eventually hits; the brief's reading is 2.2x a year.

Proxy types
model_release
Unit
days
Cadence
monthly
Valve
invention to product

2How we track this

  • derived metric training_power_doubling_days (formula in the semantic layer)
Normal band
≥ 365 days
Fast band
≤ 230 days
Falsifying

Normal = doubling no faster than yearly (grid-connection pace); fast = every 230 days or less (3x a year, the pace a runaway buildout needs). Between is emerging.

Applied to metric:training_power_doubling_days.

3Tracker interpretation

Estimated from hardware counts and thermal design power; a proxy for the buildout's physical footprint, not a metered figure.

4Evidence

Latest point
506 daysas of 2026-08-07(213 obs)
Value the bands apply to
506 days(332 days1067 days)as of 2026-08-07(213 obs)

213 observations. Hollow points are disputed (see counterevidence). Every point links to its observation.

Derived rows (1)
as ofdimsvalueinputs
2026-08-07330.8 168 0.077506 daysobs:0064d6a3obs:0345be86obs:075cc617+210 more

5Status and reasoning

emergingsince 2026-09-10 · evaluate

Log-linear fit on 168 notable models' estimated training power draw since 2020: doubling every 506 days (CI 332-1067), inside the normal band (yearly or slower), but the fit explains almost none of the variance (r2 0.08) because the notable set mixes small and frontier models. Single tier-6 source and a weak fit: emerging. Initial seed.

6Timeline notes

  • 2026-08-07 · 506 daysas of 2026-08-07(213 obs)

7Counterevidence

What cuts against this reading

Power draw is estimated for nearly every model; the notable set skews to models whose hardware is public.

8Update history

  1. 2026-09-10unmeasured to emergingconf 50 · evaluate

    Log-linear fit on 168 notable models' estimated training power draw since 2020: doubling every 506 days (CI 332-1067), inside the normal band (yearly or slower), but the fit explains almost none of the variance (r2 0.08) because the notable set mixes small and frontier models. Single tier-6 source and a weak fit: emerging. Initial seed.

9Confidence

50 / 95 — mixed or hard to operationalise

Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.

10Related