Training power draw growth (doubling time)
1What this measures
Doubling time of notable models' estimated training power draw, fitted log-linearly from 2020 on Epoch's notable-model table. Derived metric training_power_doubling_days.
Why it matters. Power is the physical constraint that compute growth eventually hits; the brief's reading is 2.2x a year.
- Proxy types
- model_release
- Unit
- days
- Cadence
- monthly
- Valve
- invention to product
2How we track this
- derived metric
training_power_doubling_days(formula in the semantic layer)
- Normal band
- ≥ 365 days
- Fast band
- ≤ 230 days
- Falsifying
- —
Normal = doubling no faster than yearly (grid-connection pace); fast = every 230 days or less (3x a year, the pace a runaway buildout needs). Between is emerging.
Applied to metric:training_power_doubling_days.
3Tracker interpretation
Estimated from hardware counts and thermal design power; a proxy for the buildout's physical footprint, not a metered figure.
4Evidence
213 observations. Hollow points are disputed (see counterevidence). Every point links to its observation.
Derived rows (1)
| as of | dims | value | inputs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | 330.8 168 0.077 | 506 days | obs:0064d6a3obs:0345be86obs:075cc617+210 more |
5Status and reasoning
Log-linear fit on 168 notable models' estimated training power draw since 2020: doubling every 506 days (CI 332-1067), inside the normal band (yearly or slower), but the fit explains almost none of the variance (r2 0.08) because the notable set mixes small and frontier models. Single tier-6 source and a weak fit: emerging. Initial seed.
6Timeline notes
- 2026-08-07 · 506 daysas of 2026-08-07(213 obs)
7Counterevidence
What cuts against this reading
Power draw is estimated for nearly every model; the notable set skews to models whose hardware is public.
8Update history
- 2026-09-10unmeasured to emergingconf — → 50 · evaluate
Log-linear fit on 168 notable models' estimated training power draw since 2020: doubling every 506 days (CI 332-1067), inside the normal band (yearly or slower), but the fit explains almost none of the variance (r2 0.08) because the notable set mixes small and frontier models. Single tier-6 source and a weak fit: emerging. Initial seed.
9Confidence
50 / 95 — mixed or hard to operationalise
Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.
10Related
- Frontier training compute growth (doubling time) emerging
- Circular financing scale concentrating
- Crosswalk: Methods ⇄ Compute & physical (input to)