Application layer's share of enterprise generative-AI spend (Menlo)
1What this measures
Enterprise spend on generative-AI applications as a share of total enterprise generative-AI spend in the US, per Menlo Ventures' annual buyer survey (derived metric enterprise_app_spend_share).
Why it matters. The only published layer split of enterprise dollars. A rising application share means buyers' money is landing above the model layer, where the model-tax question starts.
- Proxy types
- capital_flow
- Unit
- share
- Cadence
- annual
2How we track this
- series
menlo.us_enterprise.genai_spend_usd.fy - series
menlo.us_enterprise.genai_app_spend_usd.fy - derived metric
enterprise_app_spend_share(formula in the semantic layer) - source Menlo Ventures, State of Generative AI in the Enterprise · default tier 6 · Report
Direction over 1 periods, dead-band 5.0%; higher = concentrating.
Two annual waves, so the trend is one step; a move under five points is within survey error. Rising application share = value concentrating at the application layer.
Applied to metric:enterprise_app_spend_share.
3Tracker interpretation
Applications took a third of enterprise generative-AI dollars in 2024 and half in 2025; the money is moving up the stack even as chips keep the margin.
4Evidence
Direction over the last 1 periods; the band is ±5.0% around the window's first point. Higher reads concentrating.
4 observations. Hollow points are disputed (see counterevidence). Every point links to its observation.
Derived rows (2)
| as of | dims | value | inputs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 51.4% | obs:6012e72eobs:790ba59b | |
| 2024-12-31 | 33.3% | obs:eb8d37a9obs:fbc90648 |
5Status and reasoning
Menlo Ventures' buyer surveys: applications took $4.6B of $13.8B enterprise generative-AI spend in 2024 (33%) and $19B of $37B in 2025 (51%), an 18-point rise against a five-point dead band, so the direction reads concentrating at the application layer. Capped at emerging because Menlo is the only source and a survey is tier 6; a second, independent layer split would lift the cap. Initial seed.
6Timeline notes
7Counterevidence
What cuts against this reading
Survey of a few hundred buyers, not filings; scope excludes chips, standalone inference and embedded features, so the infrastructure denominator is understated; two waves only.
8Update history
- 2026-09-10unmeasured to emergingconf — → 55 · evaluate
Menlo Ventures' buyer surveys: applications took $4.6B of $13.8B enterprise generative-AI spend in 2024 (33%) and $19B of $37B in 2025 (51%), an 18-point rise against a five-point dead band, so the direction reads concentrating at the application layer. Capped at emerging because Menlo is the only source and a survey is tier 6; a second, independent layer split would lift the cap. Initial seed.
9Confidence
55 / 95 — mixed or hard to operationalise
Confidence is independent of status: 90–95 multiple strong independent sources; 70–89 good evidence, some ambiguity; 50–69 mixed or hard to operationalise; below 50 limited or vague.
10Related
- Semiconductors' share of stack operating income concentrating
- Bottlenecks #75 (Narayanan & Kapoor's list)